No 150k on Absolute this month

Posted by admin on Nov 3rd, 2008
2008
Nov 3

The backer for my tournaments has had to tone down my stakings this month, but it isn’t to any fault of my own. In fact, I believe it was quite the contrary. Either way, I’m not able to play the $150k Guaranteed on Absolute this month.


Don’t get me wrong, I love that tournament. But I just can’t defend playing it when it will equate to roughly 1/2 of my risk this month. I’m only able to risk less than 1/2 the same amount per week as I was last month (although it still is a lot) and thus I really have to make sure the tournaments I’m playing I have the highest edge in.


So this month, I’m playing in the following tournaments:

  • Sunday Warmup on Stars
  • $109 50k on Stars
  • $109 50k on Cake
  • $162 100k on Cake
  • Sunday Million on Stars
  • $750k on Full Tilt


  • I might throw in the $109 on Bodog when I feel like depositing there, but like I posted last week I’m still pretty pissed with them right now (they did reject our application but I don’t want to talk about it). Otherwise that’s my Sunday, hopefully I’ll be able to get some cash games in on Player’s Only/Cake.

    Cafe Salsa

    Posted by admin on Nov 3rd, 2008
    2008
    Nov 3

    I’m a little late in writing this, but who knows where the time goes. On Saturday, Marlyn and I went out to eat lunch at Cafe Salsa, a Cuban-style restaurant in downtown Alexandria.


    I’d say it was pretty authentic feeling inside. You don’t get chips and salsa but instead fried-banana slices with a hearty olive-based dip. I liked it.


    As an appetizer, Marlyn and I ordered some Seafood Ceviche, which was served without tostadas and made it quite awkward to eat. As usual, the Ceviche was served cold but they had to use a lot of lemon juice to hide the seafood flavor from the shrimp, scallops, fish and squid. The lemon juice made it taste odd and without a necessary crunch I didn’t care for this dish (although it was OK when I started to eat it with the banana chips).


    As a main course, I ordered the Nueva Ropa Vieja, which was basically a barbacoa-style beef stewed with bell peppers served on rice with cooked bananas. Marlyn liked the bananas the best, but I really like the way the beef tasted. I would order it again.


    Marlyn ordered something not on the online menu, it had grilled cornmeal on the outside and its a famous dish, although I can’t remember it now. It was pretty good, probably better than my dish.


    We split a desert, which was the first time I’ve ever had Flan. I have to say, it was pretty good and I was very surprised. I think the Flan was the best thing on the menu, if that says anything.


    The atmosphere in the place was only OK. I felt that the dishes might have been dirty and there was a guy on a date wearing a bluetooth headset that was annoying the crap out of me (although it had nothing to do with the restaurant itself). I would like to go back to Cafe Salsa to try out some other dishes, but truthfully that wont happen for a while given we have higher priority restaurants.

    The Race: A Play Based on the Election(?)

    Posted by admin on Oct 31st, 2008
    2008
    Oct 31

    The question mark is there because I am still confused at what this play was about. Here’s an email Marlyn received about The Race:

    As the 2008 Presidential election reaches a fever pitch, Georgetown University’s Theater and Performance Studies Program charts ever more daring artistic territory with the world premiere production of The Race, an interactive, wildly unpredictable and entertaining civic theater project that is unlike any theatrical production you have ever experienced.


    Conceived and directed by Visiting Professor Michael Rohd, The Race breaks down the traditional walls by incorporating a cross-section of voices into an on-stage conversation about some of the most important issues raised by the upcoming election: Who will vote for whom? Who won’t? Why? And most specifically, what does leadership mean today?


    The show itself is a three-part event. Part One is a performance that sets up the rules and questions for what follows. Part Two asks the questions- and uses interactive media and deceptively simple structures to involve the audience, and participants around the country, in the conversation. And Part Three mines completely different territory by marrying elements of a town hall meeting and a karaoke bar.



    We were expecting a history of the 2008 election as it happened so far, but with actors and actresses and hopefully some funny dialogue. You know, the actors would mimic the candidates from the start of the primaries through the end of the election. Sure, we know what happens in the end but that doesn’t mean the play can’t be good.


    Given that they started work on this project 18 months prior, this sounded like a reasonable assumption. What also fed this assumption was that as you walk in, they’re showing video clips and audio tracks from all the candidate’s primary runs. Remember those old Huckabee and Ron Paul commercials? This play could actually be good.


    Wrong! And on so many levels. Maybe it was the theatre that the play was held in, but the technical aspects of the play were horrible. They only had two microphones (yes, handheld mics) that they had to pass around to the 12 cast members so they could talk. Wait, this isn’t a 4th grade play is it?


    In the middle of the play they tried doing some web conferencing with other students from all over the globe (I still have no idea what the point of that was). Apparently, Apple computers DONT handle video conference that well. Because we couldnt hear any of the people they were talking to as they had audio problems. So what did they do? They translated what the people said to us. Wow, you know you could have saved 10 minutes (literally) of play time? If you had just read the questions and answers aloud in the first place.


    Questions and answers–Keep that thought in your head because I think a good 1/2 the play was just the actors asking questions to each other then they respond unrehearsed. We paid $15 in tickets for this! There was no acting. This wasn’t a play. This wasn’t a performance. It was like we had to pay $15 to hear what other people think about the election and the world today. And by other people I mean college students; more specifically: college students at GEORGETOWN. Almost as much as I hate conservatives for their ignorance and moron-ism, I dislike liberals for their narrow views and right-bashing.


    That’s right, I hate everybody (except for independants). I personally don’t care what college students think about what makes a good ‘leader’ but frankly, I bet they could have Googled “college student,” “blog,” and “leadership” and saved everyone hours of their time. This isn’t even including the poor actors who followed that director for 18 months.


    18 months!!! WTF? I’ve seen better productions put on by my high school ‘Winter One Acts’ that took only a few months to put together. What a waste of time and resources (and the liberals blame the republicans for the recession…zing!)


    Maybe it was our fault for interpreting this play wrong, but this thing was absolutely dreadful. If it was a movie we would have walked out 30 minutes in. But, we already took the metro ride into the city to watch a play we might as well finish it.


    There was one bright spot to the play (other than when it ended). It happened when they had everyone in their chairs get up and fill some bleachers they brought in to make a mock ‘town hall’ type feeling. Trust me, we weren’t the only ones who didn’t want to get up (especially the guy surfing the internet ON HIS LAPTOP); but since it improved the performance I’m guessing it was a good thing.


    The ‘karaoke’ mentioned in the email came from this: people were asked to get up and give campaign speeches, taken from the candidates themselves. Yes, the Giulani speech referenced 9/11 3 times in 60 seconds; no, Huckabee didn’t mention Chuck Norris in his speech. People that gave boring speeches (like McCain) were pretty lame. I would have much rather chosen to listen to a Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich speech, if not purely for entertainment value.


    Outside of this 10 minute session, the rest of the performance was pretty bad. I still don’t understand what it was about and frankly I don’t think I want to. I feel bad for one person though: Marlyn. She tried hard to find an entertaining play and, if our assumption was correct, then I think that it would have been much more entertaining.


    Oh well, at least it got me out of the apartment for one night. I’ll end this post with the funniest lines of last night. It happened from a guy sitting behind me about 20 minutes into the performance:


    God, this is awful.


    This is Jeffrey Lipsey, and I support this message.

    My Week So Far

    Posted by admin on Oct 31st, 2008
    2008
    Oct 31

    Well, the week has gone by so fast I don’t even know where it went. Today is Friday and I haven’t played poker since Sunday. That doesn’t mean I haven’t been working though…


    As I mentioned in a previous post, I spent most of Monday dealing with the video intros and outros with my brother, but since then my PC has been going non stop for 60 hours… converting ONLY 13 videos from wmv to flash. Given that Grinderschool has over 200 videos and if I split the work evenly with JGB, then I’m still looking at running that PC for a month straight to finish all the conversions. This is rather disappointing news.


    From Tuesday through Thursday I’ve been dealing with Poker Affiliates for the upcoming Grinderschool redesign. Apparently when you sign up for an affiliate they don’t give you the ‘best’ deal, for us or our subscribers. I had to email all 25 of the separate poker accounts that we will have affiliate relationships with in order to confirm that they did, in fact, give us the rakeback account. It is true, of the majority of the sites that offer rakeback, they did not give us the rakeback affiliate account (I’d say 90% were like this).


    I wont say any names, but even when confronted and asked directly: does my affiliate account offer rakeback they either tried to walk around the question or just said no. My point to this that of the 10 or so sites that offer rakeback, only one came out and said we had the best deal and another 1 came out and offered us the best deal when asked.


    That leaves a remarkable 8/10 (I’m exaggerating a little because I don’t have the exact number, but its around there) that, even when asked, still didn’t offer us the best deal. Here’s the typical email chain for each site:


    Me: Hey, does my affiliate account allow rakeback? (obviously more polite and formal)
    Them: No
    Me: Is that because your site does not allow it or because you haven’t authorized our account?
    Them: Because you haven’t been authorized.
    Me: Could you please authorize our account?
    Them: Ok, we’ll have to negotiate rates. Please sign up again.


    Each of the above conversations were separate emails back and forth, and although my replies were instantaneous it wasn’t always the case with them. A lot of the times they would take 30 minutes or more to respond, which wasn’t exactly all that bad given the fact I had to do this OVER AND OVER for all the poker sites. There were about 20 separate email chains to different affiliates going over such simple and mundane questions; it was quite frustrating.


    That was pretty much my schedule from Tuesday-Thursday, but I’m happy to say I’ve finally gotten that taken care of. We’re still in talks with Bodog, which happens to be the only poker site who seemingly HATES traffic because they are such a b**ch to deal with. They are vetting our site and intentions more than McCain did Palin (too easy of a zing, that I won’t mention it); at some point you have to hold your ground and say:


    Fuck you! How about YOU give me your best rates and we can talk about a deal?


    I knew they are hard to deal with because I’ve tried to work with them in the past with no success. It seems like they don’t like free advertising; what morons. Also, they’re support team is so informal it feels like I’m talking to a group of Frat jag-offs. I’ve had affiliates literally call me from AUSTRALIA so they can give us the best deal; and they’re part of networks much more trustworthy and larger than that of Bodog. I’ve also talked with a couple reps via instant messenger (apparently MSN is the medium of choice in the poker industry) and these people have given me their real names and personal email address. Those are people that care.


    Not Bodog. My response email from them came from “Bodog Affiliate Team.” Not an individual person. No Mark, Steve, Neri, Bob, or Dorothy (actual affiliate support names). Its like I’m emailing the entire department, not an individual person. Fuck that, I’ve got 25 other sites I can send players and frankly, we don’t need Bodog that bad anyway.


    That was yesterday; I’ve yet to receive a response after I sent them an email back (obv I was a little more courteous and cordial). I have no idea if they’re actually going to approve us but after a while I just don’t care.


    And now we’re on Friday, Halloween. What am I going to do? I have no idea.

    My IRA didn’t get smoked by the recession…

    Posted by admin on Oct 28th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 28

    Sure, I lost some, but no where near as much as I could have or as much as my other investing account (which I haven’t updated the post on here because of how bad it got). However, I guess I can feel proud from my IRA when it only dropped 16.67% through the entire fall of the market, compared to the drop of 11,400 to 8400 in the Dow (26.4%).


    Part of this came from the fact that I don’t actually have much in my IRA, given I’m only like 25 and I’ve just started to fund it for year 2008 (although I still plan to max it out by April, 2009). The other part came from a lack of diversification, which is due to the lack of funds. Through the majority of this downturn I had my money in 2 funds:


    -IShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond, currently yielding 4.01% (Symbol: IEF)
    -IShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond Fun, currently yielding 11.0% (Symbol: HYG)


    I figured the best way to get through the market was to just buy bonds right now, as they do go up in value as the interest rate falls. Granted, “High Yield” is just another term for Junk Bond, and having the ETFs are another way for diversification.


    Of these two, the only one that went down was HYG, and that lost about 1/3 of the value, but the treasury stock went up. And this was before the .5% in dividend payments I receive per month. So, in actuality, I’m down ~10% in this dowturn, a full 15% less than the Dow.


    I recently purchased the Gold ETF (GLD) which i talk about trades a lot in my normal portfolio but at $70/share that is an easy long term investment surrounded by several near term trades (since there is no yield).

    Monday was a long day

    Posted by admin on Oct 28th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 28

    Yesterday I spent pretty much all day working on the Intro and Outro files for Grinderschool videos, since we’re so close to the redesign. That means I spent a good part of the day talking with my brother, as he was in charge of the background music.


    After several back-and-forths we finally got a working version, and right now JGB and I are just trying to figure out the small problems in the FLV converting process before we can really hammer down and get things done. We’re going to convert all of our videos from .wmv to FLV for better access and we have like 200+ videos.


    I think it takes about 5 minutes a video to set up followed by an hour to convert, so in theory I can only convert like 20 videos/day on my PC. Throw in a possible 10/day by JGB and it’s going to take a good week or more just to build up the database. We had planned on a November 1 release but it be a November 10 release instead, which I guess isn’t that bad as long as we get everything alright.


    The almost finished product:


    http://www.jeffreylipsey.com/Bob2Jeff/Untitled10.wmv


    Thanks to my brother for the mashup! It took a while to get moving but once we found the Apologize midi file from One Republic things went rather quickly and I like the product we have.

    Sunday Tournament Recap Part 2

    Posted by admin on Oct 28th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 28

    I figured I should probably finish this recap before it gets too late. Cliff Notes: I finished the Sunday going 0-fer on cashes.


    My only chance of cashing came in the Bodog Tourney where I got close to the bubble but never really got anything going. I went from 20 BB to 10 rather quickly and before I knew it I had to shove A6o UTG with 7 BB with the blinds going up.


    I mentioned in my previous post that I doubled up early in the Cake 250k with AA vs my buddy’s KK, well I gave all that back with AA all in preflop vs 55 that didn’t hold. I then ran AK into AA on that tourney and it was pretty much the end of my night; I unregistered from the Absolute Tournament again for the second week in a row.


    Overall, it was a frustrating day and month tournament wise. I have one bright spot though for the day: I made $320+ in the $200 NL cash game on Cake waiting on more tournaments to start.

    Sunday Tournament Recap Part 1

    Posted by admin on Oct 26th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 26

    Well, I’m half way through my day and I haven’t had much of anything go my way. The first two tournaments, the $109 on Stars and 250k “Brawl” on Tilt I lost to coinflips with JJ and QQ all in preflop to AQ and AK respectively deep in the 2nd hour.


    I busted the Cake $50k when I runner-runner boated a hand in the blinds with only 13 BB which I was drawing dead to on the flop. I only lost 1/2 my stack there but then 2 hands later I shoved J8o into AK with 6 BB on the button and lost that.


    The deepest so far was the Sunday Warmup, where I busted less than 100 players from ITM when I shoved KJs 8 bb deep into JJ, me hitting two pair doesn’t do much good when one of them gives him trips. But that really wasn’t the hand in question that defined the fate of the tournament.


    Right after doubling up to 30k chips by winning a coinflip, I’m at 28 BB and I’ve been reraising some players fairly aggro, but I’ve had hands each time. I get dealt KQs in the SB and CO opens 2.5x the bb; I have not a good read on him through 18 hands but I think he was fairly aggressive. I knew I couldn’t fold and when I took the slider over from his 3k raise to 9k I didn’t like the fact I only had 19k behind, and I’d be setting myself up to be 4bet bluffed. I guess I could reraise/call the all in with KQs 28 bb deep but that feels dirty to me without at least a decent read. And if I had THAT solid of a read then I would just shove all in, which is another option.


    What happened was I took the cash game route with KQs there and flat OOP, although in a cash game 28 BB deep I’d probably have just shoved. The flop came J82r and I was just going to check/fold, but he checked back himself and the turn came an innocuous 6. I bet fairly large of 3/4 pot as that was my chance to steal if it I had any. He tanked for a while and then called and I gave up the river. He showed 8c3c and played middle pair well and I would have won preflop with a ship. Would that have affected the tournament? Maybe, maybe not, as my my shove with 8 BB would have been just as standard with 14 BB so its likely it wouldn’t have changed anything.


    While writing this I busted the $50k on FTP in the second hour running AK into AA and doubled up in the $250k on Cake with AA vs my friend’s KK AI preflop. I’ll be making a second update at the end of my day but I still have 5-6 tournaments to go through.

    Busted 20th in the $530 on Absolute

    Posted by admin on Oct 25th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 25

    Well, I’m not getting much cash game play in this month but I’m happy I’m keeping up with my tournaments. Tonight I busted 20th in the $150k guaranteed, although one of these times I’m going to final table.


    To tell the truth, I made a bad play and it possibly cost me the chance to make the final table. There were 28 left and we were already in the money when I get dealt this hand:


    http://www.pokerhand.org/?3367515


    This is a fairly standard call no matter what the stats were on my opponent, and I’m not being results oriented. I even told Adil, who was ghosting me, that this is a standard call before I had to do it….I just didn’t do it. I was too worried about moving up a pay level to 27th than busting 28th, and the sad thing was it was only like 1/2 the buy in difference. If it was a $10 tourney or if we were 27th I wouldn’t even hesitate to make this call. With that I’m very disappointed. Sure, I made a “soul read” that the guy behind me woke up with KK and I would have won the 3 way all in, but it doesn’t make my play correct. Even if the guy behind me didn’t have KK and I get in the coinflip against the opponent, when I win that flip I’m well on the way to the final table. The fact that I would have tripled up here is just salt in the wounds.


    I did make a sick move on the money bubble that made up for my poor play, even though it happened before the above hand. The situation: there were 37 left with top 36 paid. I’ve been fairly tight and the open raiser is a regular and decent player. I had just doubled up with AK so I have a solid image.


    http://www.pokerhand.org/?3367565


    That said, this bubble move is sick because 37th place gets $0 and 36th gets $750. If I lose I still have enough big blinds that I can fold to cash fairly easily and they have to fold all but they’re most strongest of hands because of the bubble effect.


    So I guess it was an up and down tournament. I made one great play and I made one bad fold, but hopefully I don’t make that mistake next time.

    Math Day 2: Finding out fold equity

    Posted by admin on Oct 24th, 2008
    2008
    Oct 24

    Yesterday I went and determined the amount of fold equity we needed in order for a bet/3bet all in to be break even with AcJc on a Ad5c4c board. If you remember, I found that the break even fold equity for that hand to be 62.0 percent. Well, how do we know exactly how much fold equity we have?


    It wasn’t long ago that I thought this number was imaginary, or something that was just guestimated with somewhat accuracy and numbers thrown out there by the ‘in-the-know.’ Not true at all! Growing up in limit hold’em I never really had to deal with the concept of fold equity but mostly just trying to find ways to get value out of opponents. However, my limit hold’em days were years ago and now its no longer an excuse.


    To start with fold equity, we have to put our opponent on a range. This can either be concrete or variable but you can’t determine fold equity without at least putting your opponents on a range of hands. In our example, you can either start with the hands that your opponent is raising with on the flop or just calling the all in. I prefer to do the easiest one first, which happens to be what is he calling an all in with? We determined yesterday that our opponent was only calling an all in with a set: 55, 66, or AA.


    Now that we have his calling all in range, we have to find out how many total combination of hands he can possibly have with the set. Given the board of Ad5c6c and our hand of AcJc, our opponent can only have 3 combinations of pocket 5s (5d5s, 5d5h, 5h5s), three combinations of pocket 6s (6d6s, 6d6h, 6h6s) and only one combination of pocket paces (AsAh) for a total of 7 combinations.


    After we have the number of calling combinations, we have to find the number of raising combinations; in other we words lets find out his raising range on this flop. We already know he’s raising 55, 66, and AA but what else can he raise? To find this let’s first find out what his preflop raise (PFR) range is: the read given was that he raised 8% of his hands, but that number isn’t exactly accurate.


    I say that the number isn’t accurate is because the 8% PFR is a weighted average over all of our opponent’s raising range. The most accurate number would be his open raise % given each position, a number not available in Poker Tracker but is available in Hold’em Manager. I can guestimate that our opponent’s open raise range in Middle Position would probably be something like 10-13%. If we use 13% as a figure, that puts our opponent’s range somewhere around:


    44+,ATs+,KTs+,QJs,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,AJo+,KJo+


    If you were to plug 13% into Poker Stove you wouldn’t get this exact range, and that’s because our opponent isn’t always opening the exact top 13% of his hands, but a sometime polar range including smaller pairs and suited connectors. However, we can look at that opening range to determine what he is going to raise us with on the flop. If you take out pure bluffs and include only semibluffs, his semibluffing range here would probably be: 8c7c, KcQc and maybe KcTc. That increases the total number of combinations we have from 7 to 10, but even if he folds the two K high flush draws if we shove we still don’t have the required 62% fold equity. In fact, we don’t want him to fold his two K high flush draws so shoving would be pretty horrible there.


    What we’re wanting him to fold though are his value raising range, maybe AQ but especially AK. Again, some players wont even raise a hand like AK here and most wont raise AQ unless they have a read or are willing to stack off with it. Say our opponent raise/folds AK in this situation, that gives him a possible 8 possible AK combinations that he could fold after a raise (and also 8 AQ combinations if you want to put that in there).


    Okay, we have the number of raising combinations:


    Sets: 7 Combos
    Top Pair: 8 (16 if you include AQ)
    Semibluffs: Max 3 (none of which we actually want to fold if we shove)


    Total raising combinations: 15 (23 with AQ, 26 with semibluffs).


    We already determined he was only going to call us with sets only, so that gives him 7 calling combinations out of 15, or 8 folding combinations. Our Fold Equity then with that range is 8/15, or 53.3%, which is clearly below our Break Even number of 62.0%. What if he raises AQ and folds it? Well, now that is 16 folding combinations out of 23, so our fold equity there is 16/23 or 69.6%.


    So, in order for our shove to be profitable our opponent has to raise/fold AQ and AK in this spot. How profitable? Well, all we have to do is plug in our two percentages back in the EV Formula from yesterday:


    EV = %Fold * Value of fold + %Call*Value of a call


    Where:


    % Fold = 53.3% and then 69.6%
    % Call = 46.9% and then 30.4%
    Value of fold = $106
    Value of Call = -$173.03


    Plugging these numbers in, you’ll find that the EV when our opponent raise/folds either AK OR AQ is:


    .533*106 + .469*(-173.03) = 56.50 - 81.15 = -$24.65


    And the EV when our opponent raise/folds both AK AND AQ is:


    .696*106 + .304*(-173.03) = 73.78 - 52.60 = +$21.28

    Thus, you can see there is a significant difference between the EV of the two scenarios, where if he raise/folds AQ then shoving is +EV and probably superior than just bet/calling or check/calling. But, this isn’t the place for that exercise. However I’ve specifically proven when it is correct to shove our hand and when it is incorrect to:


    It depends on our opponent’s raise/folding range in this situation and our equity when called vs that range..

    « Prev - Next »