I watch a lot of television during the day, and most of it is CNBC. The last week or so they’ve covered the Congress hearings pretty exclusively and I’ve had the chance to hear what some of the talking-heads feel.
So the first thing you have to ask is: Is this program fair? Hell no. Why should the taxpayers on ‘Main Street’ bail out Wall Street? One reason: Because everyone is fucked if we don’t.
I won’t be screwed, I’m pretty diversified and I doubt my stocks can go that much lower (lol??) and I’ve got a decent amount of cash. Its not like myself or Marlyn will get ‘laid-off’ if we go into a severe depression. If anything it will give me a chance to buy stocks at a severe discount. So for me it wouldn’t be that bad. It’s you that I’m worried about.
Well, maybe not you exactly. But those that have a significant portion invested in their retirement account that cant handle another 20% decrease in the market. Those that live paycheck to paycheck or are on a fixed income that cant stand to see inflation rise to extreme amounts.
Banks will write off more foreclosures and will inevitably fail. Consumer confidence will fall so much that people will start to horde their cash in their mattresses than in the bank. We will likely go into a depression.
We will eventually come out of it, maybe in 2-3 years when home prices stabilize and a new administration comes into office. But we don’t need to wait.
People don’t realize that the $700 billion ‘Bailout’ isn’t an expense, its a liability. The government is going to purchase a $700 billion mortgage, basically, that is going to be at 30% off. Obviously you can never ‘guarantee’ a profit, but if all the government does is sit on these mortgages for a few years then they’ll get the money back. Money will not be wasted, as the houses will act as collateral for the loans.
After listening to the congressmen ask questions, I realized they must not know the difference between a liability and an expense, assets and risk.
I hope in the end they do pass the bailout, which was incorrectly named. Jim Cramer said it best: It shouldn’t have been named a ‘Bailout’ but instead an Invest in America plan.